Faster69
#17,272 of 19,095
Download reportPDF
Real-user data through
Recent
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Recent
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Stale
Latest recorded sitemap check · over 12 days old
Head to head
Faster
Provider average65
#22 of 24 providers
Verdict
Cook Ford is faster
Scores 69 vs 65 and wins 4 of 5 Core Web Vitals. The server answers 12% faster.
Metric by metric
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Cook Ford
Jazel AutoReal-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
69
+4 pts
65
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
3,297 ms
5% faster
3,468 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
253 ms
205 ms
19% faster
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.13
0.06 less shift
0.19
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
2,586 ms
9% faster
2,855 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
2,173 ms
12% faster
2,470 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
11.5 MB
6% lighter
12.2 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
521
341
180 fewer
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
426
245
181 fewer
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
6.14 MB
4.38 MB
29% lighter
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
92
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
87
88
+1 pts
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
54
78
+24 pts
More matchups
Nearby Ford dealers, and how Cook Ford stacks up against its provider's average.