78
#12,723 of 19,095
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check · over 12 days old
Head to head
78
#12,723 of 19,095
74
#18 of 24 providers
Verdict
Cocoa Ford is faster
Scores 78 vs 74 and wins 2 of 5 Core Web Vitals. The server answers 43% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
78
+3 pts
74
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
2,854 ms
2,922 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
200 ms
31% faster
290 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.21
0.20
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
2,351 ms
2,178 ms
7% faster
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
618 ms
43% faster
1,092 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
11.9 MB
11.5 MB
4% lighter
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
253
20 fewer
273
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
199
25 fewer
224
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
4.12 MB
19% lighter
5.06 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
93
+1 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
94
+6 pts
88
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
+17 pts
75
Nearby Ford dealers, and how Cocoa Ford stacks up against its provider's average.