80
#10,963 of 19,095
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check · over 12 days old
Head to head
80
#10,963 of 19,095
74
#18 of 24 providers
Verdict
Classic Toyota Hampton is faster
Scores 80 vs 74 and wins 4 of 5 Core Web Vitals. The server answers 37% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
80
+5 pts
74
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
2,442 ms
16% faster
2,922 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
233 ms
20% faster
290 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.21
0.20
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,904 ms
13% faster
2,178 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
690 ms
37% faster
1,092 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
11.4 MB
11.5 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
349
273
76 fewer
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
309
224
85 fewer
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
6.95 MB
5.06 MB
27% lighter
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
85
93
+8 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
87
88
+1 pts
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
73
75
+2 pts
Nearby Toyota dealers, and how Classic Toyota Hampton stacks up against its provider's average.