80
#10,175 of 19,164
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window · over 21 days old
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
80
#10,175 of 19,164
79
#14 of 24 providers
Verdict
Apple Ford is faster
Scores 80 vs 79 and wins 3 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 43% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
80
+2 pts
79
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
2,056 ms
7% faster
2,217 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
204 ms
43% faster
361 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.22
0.17
0.05 less shift
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,505 ms
5% faster
1,586 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
1,039 ms
1,053 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
8.88 MB
5% lighter
9.3 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
330
306
24 fewer
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
253
227
26 fewer
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
3.79 MB
10% lighter
4.23 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
94
+2 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
93
+2 pts
91
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
31
56
+25 pts
Nearby Ford dealers, and how Apple Ford stacks up against its provider's average.