Faster89
#2,619 of 19,095
Real-user data through
Recent
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Recent
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Not availableNo data
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
Faster
Provider average87
#5 of 24 providers
Verdict
C & M Ford is faster
Scores 89 vs 87 and wins 3 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 53% faster.
Metric by metric
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
C & M Ford
DealerOnReal-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
89
+2 pts
87
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,382 ms
12% faster
1,579 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
88 ms
53% faster
187 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.18
0.15
0.03 less shift
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,115 ms
9% faster
1,223 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
706 ms
696 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
6.06 MB
55% lighter
13.5 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
325
294
31 fewer
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
210
197
13 fewer
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
3.13 MB
30% lighter
4.44 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
85
93
+8 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
88
92
+4 pts
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
69
75
+6 pts
More matchups
Nearby Ford dealers, and how C & M Ford stacks up against its provider's average.