Faster89
#2,410 of 19,095
Real-user data through
Recent
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Recent
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Not availableNo data
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
Faster
Provider average87
#5 of 24 providers
Verdict
Otto Cadillac is faster
Scores 89 vs 87 and wins 2 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 17% faster.
Metric by metric
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Otto Cadillac
DealerOnReal-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
89
+2 pts
87
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,650 ms
1,579 ms
4% faster
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
155 ms
17% faster
187 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.10
0.05 less shift
0.15
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,222 ms
1,223 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
779 ms
696 ms
11% faster
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
14.3 MB
13.6 MB
5% lighter
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
187
108 fewer
295
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
95
102 fewer
197
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
2.32 MB
48% lighter
4.44 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
93
+1 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
93
+1 pts
92
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
96
+21 pts
75
More matchups
Nearby Cadillac dealers, and how Otto Cadillac stacks up against its provider's average.