79
#11,923 of 19,095
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window · over 21 days old
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
79
#11,923 of 19,095
79
#14 of 24 providers
Verdict
Worthington Ford is faster
Scores 79 vs 79 and wins 3 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 39% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
79
79
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
2,157 ms
2,205 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
220 ms
39% faster
362 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.30
0.17
0.13 less shift
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,287 ms
19% faster
1,581 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
817 ms
22% faster
1,047 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
11.5 MB
9.39 MB
19% lighter
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
117
190 fewer
307
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
61
167 fewer
228
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
1.45 MB
66% lighter
4.24 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
100
+6 pts
94
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
97
+6 pts
91
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
54
55
+1 pts
Nearby Ford dealers, and how Worthington Ford stacks up against its provider's average.