87
#4,013 of 19,164
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check · over 12 days old
Head to head
87
#4,013 of 19,164
79
#14 of 24 providers
Verdict
BMW of Tenafly is faster
Scores 87 vs 79 and wins 4 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Main content renders 36% sooner.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
87
+8 pts
79
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,426 ms
36% faster
2,217 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
240 ms
33% faster
361 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.17
0.17
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,063 ms
33% faster
1,586 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
753 ms
28% faster
1,053 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
26 MB
9.3 MB
64% lighter
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
393
306
87 fewer
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
306
227
79 fewer
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
5.37 MB
4.23 MB
21% lighter
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
85
94
+9 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
+1 pts
91
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
31
56
+25 pts
Nearby BMW dealers, and how BMW of Tenafly stacks up against its provider's average.