84
#6,201 of 19,095
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
84
#6,201 of 19,095
81
#11 of 24 providers
Verdict
McFarland Nissan is faster
Scores 84 vs 81 and wins 2 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 26% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
84
+3 pts
81
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
2,575 ms
2,641 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
210 ms
26% faster
284 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.03
0.08 less shift
0.11
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
2,031 ms
1,735 ms
15% faster
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
993 ms
986 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
9.99 MB
28% lighter
13.8 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
221
25 fewer
246
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
115
26 fewer
141
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
4.06 MB
14% lighter
4.71 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
96
+4 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
95
+3 pts
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
54
83
+29 pts
Nearby Nissan dealers, and how McFarland Nissan stacks up against its provider's average.