68
#17,811 of 19,158
Download reportPDF
Real-user data through
Recent
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Recent
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Recent
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
Provider averageFaster85
#5 of 24 providers
Verdict
Driverseat sites are faster
Scores 85 vs 68 and wins 4 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Main content renders 38% sooner.
Metric by metric
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Apple Auto Mitsubishi
DriverseatReal-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
68
85
+17 pts
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
2,213 ms
1,373 ms
38% faster
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
240 ms
188 ms
22% faster
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.65
0.17
0.48 less shift
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,110 ms
1,078 ms
3% faster
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
449 ms
452 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
6.37 MB
5.85 MB
8% lighter
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
258
193
65 fewer
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
207
141
67 fewer
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
5.16 MB
3.79 MB
27% lighter
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
100
+3 pts
97
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
97
+4 pts
93
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
69
78
+9 pts
More matchups
Nearby Mitsubishi dealers, and how Apple Auto Mitsubishi stacks up against its provider's average.