92

APPLE FORD

www.appleford.com

Download reportPDF

Real-user data through

Recent

CrUX rolling 28-day window

Page and vendor scan

Stale

Latest usable Lighthouse measurement · over 14 days old

Sitemap checked

Recent

Latest recorded sitemap check

Head to head

Verdict

Apple Ford is faster

Scores 92 vs 88 and wins 4 of 5 Core Web Vitals. The server answers 37% faster.

Metric by metric

Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.

Apple Ford
DriverseatDriverseat

Real-user experience

Performance score

Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better

92

+3 pts

88

Largest Contentful Paint

LCP · lower is better

1,208 ms

32% faster

1,781 ms

Interaction to Next Paint

INP · lower is better

278 ms

211 ms

24% faster

Cumulative Layout Shift

CLS · lower is better

0.11

0.02 less shift

0.13

First Contentful Paint

FCP · lower is better

862 ms

29% faster

1,207 ms

Time to First Byte

TTFB · lower is better

331 ms

37% faster

525 ms

Lab test · home page

Page weight

Home page download · lower is better

9.73 MB

5.77 MB

41% lighter

Requests

Files the home page loads · lower is better

264

196

68 fewer

Third-party requests

Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better

214

139

75 fewer

JavaScript

Script download · lower is better

6.61 MB

3.84 MB

42% lighter

SEO

Lighthouse · higher is better

85

97

+12 pts

Accessibility

Lighthouse · higher is better

87

94

+7 pts

Best practices

Lighthouse · higher is better

73

80

+7 pts

More matchups

Nearby Ford dealers, and how Apple Ford stacks up against its provider's average.