89
#2,447 of 19,095
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement · over 14 days old
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
89
#2,447 of 19,095
87
#5 of 24 providers
Verdict
Acura Peabody is faster
Scores 89 vs 87 and wins 4 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 40% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
89
+2 pts
87
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,278 ms
19% faster
1,579 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
112 ms
40% faster
187 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.19
0.15
0.04 less shift
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,082 ms
11% faster
1,223 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
624 ms
10% faster
696 ms
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
4.18 MB
69% lighter
13.4 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
148
147 fewer
295
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
66
131 fewer
197
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
1.59 MB
64% lighter
4.45 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
93
+1 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
93
+1 pts
92
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
+17 pts
75
Nearby Acura dealers, and how Acura Peabody stacks up against its provider's average.