86
#4,745 of 19,165
Real-user data through
CrUX rolling 28-day window
Page and vendor scan
Latest usable Lighthouse measurement
Sitemap checked
Latest recorded sitemap check
Head to head
86
#4,745 of 19,165
84
#6 of 24 providers
Verdict
Ackerman Toyota is faster
Scores 86 vs 84 and wins 2 of 5 Core Web Vitals. Taps and clicks get a response 39% faster.
Real-user figures are the 75th percentile of Chrome visits.
Metric
Real-user experience
Performance score
Weighted Core Web Vitals · higher is better
86
+2 pts
84
Largest Contentful Paint
LCP · lower is better
1,674 ms
12% faster
1,894 ms
Interaction to Next Paint
INP · lower is better
132 ms
39% faster
215 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift
CLS · lower is better
0.19
0.17
0.02 less shift
First Contentful Paint
FCP · lower is better
1,242 ms
1,219 ms
Time to First Byte
TTFB · lower is better
856 ms
575 ms
33% faster
Lab test · home page
Page weight
Home page download · lower is better
3.45 MB
35% lighter
5.3 MB
Requests
Files the home page loads · lower is better
201
163
38 fewer
Third-party requests
Outside scripts and pixels · lower is better
124
10 fewer
134
JavaScript
Script download · lower is better
1.05 MB
31% lighter
1.52 MB
SEO
Lighthouse · higher is better
92
96
+4 pts
Accessibility
Lighthouse · higher is better
66
89
+23 pts
Best practices
Lighthouse · higher is better
96
+11 pts
85
Nearby Toyota dealers, and how Ackerman Toyota stacks up against its provider's average.